It is difficult to speak about religious revival without running into conceptual difficulties, especially when we locate the issue in the context of "religious vs secular" debate. Philosophical dilemmas aside, it presents considerable problems as we try to grapple with the theme from the standpoint of an intensely spiritual outlook. It is easy, of course, to distinguish between the "religious" and the "spiritual" as many have done, and caution in the manner of Rumi, against loving religion more than loving God. But this represents yet another symptom of a dualistic paradigm, and an antagonistic one at that, which introduces hostility into what is originally a harmonious relationship. Religion was revealed precisely to secure man's ascent to the knowledge (however limited), and ultimately love, of God. By definition then deviation from this path is a step outside religion. How then can love of religion ever substitute the love of God when to not love Go...
Readers should be aware that this is only a test page before I get into proper blogging.
"Of all that is written I love only what a man has written with his blood. Write with blood and you will experience that blood is spirit."
- Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra